Appearance
Further Reading
The following sources have been used to inform the development of A11yCraft through their research and recommendations.
Official Guidelines
- World Wide Web Consortium. (2024, December 12). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2. https://www.w3.org/TR/2024
Academic Research
- Acosta, T., Acosta-Vargas, P., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Accessibility of eGovernment Services in Latin America. In L. Teran & A. Meier (Eds), 2018 Fifth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 67–74). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2018.8372332
- Acosta-Vargas, P., Acosta, T., & Luján-Mora, S. (2018). Framework for Accessibility Evaluation of Hospital Websites. In L. Teran & A. Meier (Eds), 2018 Fifth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 9–15). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG.2018.8372368
- Acosta-Vargas, P., Rybarczyk, Y., Pérez, J., González, M., Jimenes, K., Leconte, L., & Esparza, D. (2018). Towards Web Accessibility in Telerehabilitation Platforms. 2018 IEEE Third Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), 1, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM.2018.8580272
- Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Ullauri, L. A., & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). A Heuristic Method to Evaluate Web Accessibility for Users with Low Vision. IEEE Access, 7, 125634–125648. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939068
- Acosta-Vargas, P., Salvador-Acosta, B., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Jadán-Guerrero, J. (2022). Accessibility Challenges of E-Commerce Websites. PeerJ Computer Science, 8. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.891
- Al Mourad, M. B., Hussein, M., Kamoun, F., & Wattar, Z. (2019). Analysis of WCAG 2.0 Data Accessibility Success Criterion of E-Government Websites. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 496–503.
- Alsaeedi, A. (2020). Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks. Information, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010040
- Bi, T., Xia, X., Lo, D., Grundy, J., Zimmermann, T., & Ford, D. (2022). Accessibility in Software Practice: A Practitioner’s Perspective. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3503508
- Crabb, M., Heron, M., Jones, R., Armstrong, M., Reid, H., & Wilson, A. (2019, May 2). Developing Accessible Services: Understanding Current Knowledge and Areas for Future Support. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300446
- Dangol, P. (2023). Website Accessibility Evaluation of the Federal Government of Nepal. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-023-01076-w
- Fernandes, K., Paramananthan, S., Cockburn, L., & Nganji, J. (2023). Readily Available but How Accessible? An Analysis of the Web Accessibility of Healthcare-Related Resources. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 13(2), 188–215. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v13i2.421
- Iannuzzi, N., Manca, M., Paternò, F., & Santoro, C. (2023). Large Scale Automatic Web Accessibility Validation. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT ’23), 1, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582515.3609549
- Inal, Y., & Torkildsby, A. B. (2023). Web Accessibility in Higher Education in Norway: To What Extent Are University Websites Accessible? In J. A. Nocera, M. K. Lárusdóttir, H. Petrie, A. Piccinno, & M. Winckler (Eds), Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023 (Vol. 14142, pp. 111–122). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42280-5_7
- Kous, K., Kuhar, S., Pušnik, M., & Šumak, B. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Faculties’ Websites Accessibility Based on an Automatic Evaluation. In M. Koricic, Z. Butkovic, K. Skala, Z. Car, M. Cicin-Sain, S. Babic, V. Sruk, D. Skvorc, S. Ribaric, S. Gros, B. Vrdoljak, M. Mauher, E. Tijan, P. Pale, D. Huljenic, T. G. Grbac, & M. Janjic (Eds), 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) (pp. 1498–1502). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8757202
- Navarro-Molina, C., López-Gil, J.-M., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., & Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C. (2018). Study of the Accessibility of a Sample of Scientific Electronic Journal Publishing Platforms: Changes from 2011 to 2016. Online Information Review, 42(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2016-0107
- Pandey, M., & Dong, T. (2023, October 22). Blending Accessibility in UI Framework Documentation to Build Awareness. ASSETS ’23: Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS ’23: The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3597638.3608380
- Scanlon, E., Taylor, Z. W., Raible, J., Bates, J., & Chini, J. J. (2021). Physics Webpages Create Barriers to Participation for People with Disabilities: Five Common Web Accessibility Errors and Possible Solutions. International Journal of Stem Education, 8(2021), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00282-3
- Sik-Lanyi, C., & Orbán-Mihálykó, É. (2019). Accessibility Testing of European Health-Related Websites. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 44(11), 9171–9190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04017-z
- Sinha, A. (2020). Web Accessibility Analysis on Government of India Websites Based on WCAG. 2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216445
